I didn't start out life as someone who enjoyed collecting duplicates, in fact as a young collector (a young set collector to be more precise), who rarely had anyone to trade with, duplicates were the bane of my existence. There was nothing worse than buying a pack of cards, only to find that you already had 90%, or more, of the cards in said pack. Sometimes I would try to circumvent this problem by starting multiple sets of the same thing, but more often than not, my duplicates would just end up in a box in my closet. It wasn't the ideal way to deal with them, but it was the only way I knew. Eventually I stopped collecting cards, and then a few years later, donated the bulk of my collection, including all of those duplicates, to a charity auction.
Fast forward a decade, and I unexpectedly started collecting cards again. And of course I just had to resume with my set collecting ways again, which meant more duplicates! A curious thing started to happen with some of those duplicates this time though, this being that I wasn't getting as perturbed as I used to be by all of the extras. Some were starting to become welcome. I wasn't full on collecting them, yet, but I was intentionally keeping them together in my keeper boxes (or as I was calling them, my "I'll do something with them later" boxes). I also wasn't going out of my way to seek out duplicates, yet, but was quietly grabbing extras of guys that I liked from dime and quarter boxes, especially those guys who appeared on cards of the vintage variety (Snapper Jones is the first example that comes to mind).
Fast forwarding a few more years, and I was finally able to break free from the shackles brought on by set collecting (that's just how it felt to me, I'm not knocking set collecting, or set collectors). Ever since then, I've been all over the place collecting-wise, which I think of as just trying to find my way. I was treading in completely new territory after all. Things are a lot more settled as of late. I'm pretty sure that I know now how I'll be collecting, and what I'll be collecting going forward. One thing that has emerged from all of this, that I shouldn't be surprised by, but still kind of am, is that I now enjoy collecting multiple copies of certain cards, and will actually go out of my way to seek them out.
The trouble was, just two of the same card doesn't look very good on a page, so I bought a third from Sportlots to complete the row. The page did look better after that, but then the problem of what to fill out those other six slots with arose. He only has one card, and putting cards of someone else in that page wouldn't look very good either. Have you figured out where this is going yet? There really was only one option, for me, and that's to get six more copies to fill out the rest of the page. I was able to get two of those six just last week, from Sportlots again.
Although my goal is to complete this page, I already know that I'm not gonna stop with just four more. I'm sure that if I wanted to delve into it a little more, I could probably figure out why certain cards are appealing to me so much, I mean I have at least one row of duplicates in most of my paged player collections, and for a lot of them I don't need any more than that (unless I find some more in dime boxes), but there's just certain cards that I now want as many copies of as I can get. And honestly, I don't even care why this is, as flipping through these pages just makes me happy. That is what collecting is supposed to be about, isn't it?
I don't know if the Bubba pages will ever reach...
Moving on...
The seller that I got these last two Bubba's from, twinrick, has a really good combined shipping rate for 4 cards (90¢), so I picked myself out two more cards to round out the order, neither of which were duplicates.
People still get all excited over rookie cards, right? I'm guessing that Bob Golic's Topps rookie probably won't move any needles, even for those who answered yes. Apparently this is one of those cards that has those silly C*, D*, and C* D* variations on the back. I don't think you can choose which one you get when buying on Sportlots. Mine is the C* D* version, and for the moment, that's good enough for me. Maybe I'll get the other two at some point, but it's no rush.
Please excuse the dust bits on the scan. |
Three-Mile Lyle's got old Joe Theismann marked for death, and it's doesn't look like Washington's O-Line is gonna be able to prevent this murder from happening.
Lyle is one of those guys that I'm gonna start pushing a little more to try and complete the rest of their playing days stuff. His cards are very cheap (Late edit: I forgot that he has a Topps Mexican too!), so there really isn't much of an excuse I can put forth for having not finished his catalog already.
With shipping, these four cards came to $1.62 total. Since I wasn't looking to spend much, I was rather pleased to get all of these for roughly 40¢ apiece. I'm sure I could've found Bob and Lyle for a less at a show, but I didn't have to get up at 3am, travel a couple of hundred miles to Nashville and back, or spend $30 in gas to do so. Sometimes it's worth paying a few cents more to get cards like these online, at least for me.
I can't see myself ever collecting duplicates, but I must admit they look nice in a page.
ReplyDeleteWell, you do have plenty of time to change your tune :)
DeleteI never expected to collect dupes either, but after you blogged about the Kemps you have, I have started getting into it. All 3 Kemp RCs, Gooden RCs, Canseco RCs, Eric Davis RCs and on and on. Mostly cards from my youth that are now dirt cheap. I try to keep it at a quarter or under, and it seems like I find one or two every time I find a decent dime box.
ReplyDeleteI have a few extras of Shawn's Hoops and Skybox rookies in with my collection of his as well, but only really focus on the Fleer card because that's the one that I have the biggest childhood connection with. It's a good thing that Fleer produced about a gillion 1990-91 Fleer sets, so neither of us should ever run out of copies to find for our respective hoards.
Deletethat alzado card is fantastic. seeing the kemp and muffett together makes me think about doing something like that for a certain former dodger first baseman...
ReplyDeleteDo you have a lot of Garvey duplicates?
DeleteThat's a lot of Shawn Kemps. More than the number of children he has.
ReplyDeleteLooks like you won the comment section :)
DeleteI love that '84 football set.
ReplyDelete"That's a lot of Shawn Kemps. More than the number of children he has"...ROFL
I didn't used to think much of it, but it has grown on me in recent years.
DeleteElliptical Man's comment FTW! I can't see me actively collecting duplicates but I can see how a page of them would look good.
ReplyDeleteBrendan certainly is a witty guy. It's not for everybody, that's for sure.
Delete14 pages of Kemps = Impressive. I completed my first 9-pocket page of 2019 Topps Oakland Coliseum cards. Not sure if I'll go for any more, but who knows.
ReplyDeleteYou heard it here first, folks. Fuji's looking for more 2019 Topps Oakland Coliseum cards! :)
DeleteI can't do dupes lol. I toss them all in a box unless they are specific rookies then they are used for trade. Its really hard to hoard dupe boxes though. Used to yard sale them for $1 a large box jjst to unload them
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't have the space to hoard entire boxes of duplicates even if I wanted to. I have the space for a few binders worth though :)
DeleteI haven't hoarded multiple copies of a card since my prospecting days (anyone want ten Kris Bryan Bowman Papers?) but I definitely understand why you wouldn't just stop at two copies of a card you really like. Especially when there's no other issues of that player. 9-pocket pages of the same card does look neat, and you sure choose some great looking singles to hoard (the 2014 Topps Todd Frazier is another one)
ReplyDeleteAlso, I was late to the party on Sportlots but it is so much easier than a card show or COMC when you just want a handful of singles. I've got an order on its way to me, which I'll write about soon.
I'm glad that I was never any good at predicting who would and wouldn't be a star, otherwise I might've ended up going crazy with the hoarding much earlier in life -- and it probably wouldn't have even been for cards that I liked.
DeleteLooking forward to that post!
I like duplicate collectors because you always have a home for that card when you find one, and it's fun to watch the collection grow from afar.
ReplyDeleteI feel like Lawrence Taylor saw that card of Alzado, and vowed, "I will finish what you started."
If I wasn't so uncomfortable with having want lists on the blog, I'd make a list of the various cards that I'm collecting and put it up. Especially since some of them are harder for me to find than they seem to be for others.
DeleteYES!
I only just saw it for the first time a couple of years ago, and immediately fell in love with it upon doing so. I'd probably have more if I'd ever start going to shows again.
ReplyDelete