Saturday, January 7, 2023

The 700 Club

Today's post is #700 for this blog.

On one hand, it doesn't seem like a lot compared to some other folks, as that's less than two years worth for the daily posters; it's taken me over seven to get here. But on the other hand, a lot of other blogs have come and gone during the last seven years, the majority of whom never even got close to 700 posts. 

It does feel like something to me, but I don't know where it would rank on the chart of great blog accomplishments. So, with that in mind, I'll just be conservative and call it a mild accomplishment... yay me!

A much larger accomplishment was recently achieved by another blogger, that being, Nick, who just celebrated his 11th year over at Dime Boxes

Like the previous year, Nick celebrated his anniversary with a giveaway, which as luck would have it, I was actually kind of early for. 

Normally, I wouldn't refer to working on, and then getting stuck on, a blog post, as a good thing; but that's exactly what happened on the night of Nick's giveaway, and it actually worked out fairly well, for me that is. I don't know if it's because I'm looking for inspiration, or just seeking out a distraction, but I will often go check my blog reading list if I get stuck somewhere on a post in progress (which happens more often than it probably should), read a post or two, comment where I can, and then come back to my post and see if I can get it moving again. Sometimes it works, and sometimes it doesn't. On the night of Nick's giveaway for example, it didn't.

Early as I may have been on this particular occasion, I wasn't the earliest. I think I was #3 or 4, but was still able to get my top want, so you'll not hear any complaining from me.

Having just started back up with my Post sets, it seemed rather fortuitous that a '61 Post Jim Bunning would be amongst the freebies, and what's more, it hadn't been claimed yet! I think it's considered a win anytime you can add HOFer to a set-build. I would've been more than content with just that card, but did push the greed boundary with two more claims.

I've mentioned it a few times before, but when I was a kid, the only Mother's Cookies I ever saw (and owned) were those of the Mariners variety; thus leading me to think for the longest time that they only ever made them for the Mariners. In fact, I don't think that it was until I started reading the blogs that I found out that there had been whole mess of non-Mariners Cookie cards produced throughout my childhood. Nick had 4-5 A's up for grabs, I missed one that I would've liked to have by just a couple of minutes, but still managed to get these two. I say that I collect Blue Moon Odom, but that collection consists of only a few cards, and almost never gets added to. And I just a said few posts back, I've been very tempted to add Carney to the list of player collections, but have yet to officially do so. In the meantime though, it doesn't hurt to pick up a few of his cards here and there.

Thus ends the claims portion of the post, but if you were fortunate enough to participate in the giveaway, you're probably already well aware that Nick included some extras in each envelope/package...

It's funny, I didn't grow up an A's fan, nor did I ever even know an A's fan, and yet, as an adult, I seem to be drawn to a lot of former A's. Gene Tenace, Ken Holtzman, Catfish Hunter, Rollie Fingers, Vida Blue, Joe Rudi, Bert Campaneris, and John Odom are all players that I collect. And Sal Bando and Carney Lansford are among the players that I've thought about collecting. It's also interesting, and a bit odd, that aside from Carney, all these guys [Edit: save for Vida] retired before I was even familiar with baseball. It's just strange.

Worst scan you'll see on the blogs today!
I'm pretty sure that this is the first card from this set that I've ever seen in person, and even though I'm sure that I've seen cards from it on the blogs, it feels like this is the first time that I've even heard of the set. And without even looking at the checklist, I'm just gonna go ahead and say that this would be the card that I'd want the most from it. Oh, and aside from a suspicious "relic" card, this is now my only other post-playing days card of Senior.

Nick always includes a couple of extra Juniors, and the last couple of times they've all been new to me; this time being no exception.

These were the random portion of the extras. The is pretty neat, so I'll be keeping that one. The other two though, well, if anyone wants them, just say the word. I am thinking about working on a Kellogg's set, just not this one. And as good as Johnny Bench was, he is of almost no interest to me collecting-wise. 

Thanks again for the giveaway, Nick. And congratulations, again, on hitting the 11-year mark, it really is quite a remarkable achievement.

30 comments:

  1. I'm just guessing here, but maybe you're drawn to the '70's/'80s A's because they had a lot of great players with unique skill sets/personalities - and that seems to be you're preferred era anyhow. I find myself hoarding hockey cards from the 1970s lately, just because I'm fascinated by the characters who dominated that decade. (Getting more versed in the football/basketball stars of the day, too, but I can't collect everything lol)

    Anyway, congrats on 700 posts! That is a very impressive accomplishment, especially in just over 7 years. I'm about a year and 150+ posts behind you, so I've got some catching up to do :D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Players certainly did have more personality back then. As far as preferred sports eras go, in recent years I actually find myself more drawn to the 20's-40's, I just don't ever talk about it.

      So, I guess that means that you might be hitting #600 this year. That'll be something to look forward to :)

      Delete
  2. Happy milestone! ... Yeah, those A's teams are from my childhood, so that's why I'm drawn to them (even though they beat my Dodgers in '74, meanies). It's interesting to see how many younger folks are drawn to them. It makes me feel good, a lot more than seeing some whippersnapper sing the praises of Frank Thomas again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Frank Thomas came along at what should've been the perfect time for me to be a fan and/or to collect him, but for whatever reason, I just couldn't ever get into him.

      Delete
  3. Congrats on 700! Also, great cards from DBN! Those Kellogg's cards always look awesome no matter what condition they're in.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Congrats! The Swingin' A's are an interesting team, no doubt about it. Do you watch videos of their old games? When I watch games from the 70's and even the 80's, it strikes me how much more dynamic the game was. The way players moved, running and sliding with a lot more aggression than they do now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do. And you're right, they were playing to win. And despite differences in appearance (physical), their baseball was still pretty close to the way that it had been played for the previous couple of decades. Today's baseball can not say the same.

      Delete
  5. Congrats on the 700th post. It is a big deal. Here is to the big 1K

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, I don't know, at the rate I'm going now, and with me splitting time between three blogs, it could be upwards of 6 more years before I reach 1,000 on here. That's an awful long-time to keep doing this.

      Delete
  6. Wow, excellent milestone, Jon! I almost didn't recognize Carney Lansford without his glasses. He'd be a great player to collect. Doesn't get as much credit as he deserves.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank's, Anonymous! And no, he rarely ever receives any praise, especially from card collectors.

      Delete
  7. Congrats on 700. I'm actually right behind you and have probably taken just as long to get there. I have three more posts to put up to reach that milestone. I think I have a few more stars from that Retro set if you want some more

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oooh, another big milestone coming! And I still haven't looked at the checklist, but I do know that I'd probably only be interested in getting anyone else that I'm currently collecting.

      Delete
  8. Congrats on 700 posts! A lot of my blogging milestones were driven by the earlier days of the blog when I'd post two or even three(!) times a day. Really crawling along at a snail's pace now.

    Glad you were able to snag a few goodies from the giveaway! I, too, love almost everyone on those '70s A's teams - I sometimes think it's just a natural tendency as a follower of the game and its history, because what baseball fan doesn't like Catfish Hunter or Rollie Fingers?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can't imagine posting that many times a day. I also can't imagine trying to keep up with people posting that many times each day; it's hard enough as is just trying to read the stuff from the daily posters.

      Delete
  9. If nobody else wants Bench, I'll gladly claim him, thanks! By the way, I mailed some cards out to you last week.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Congratulations on #700! By the way... that 1975 Kellogg's Bench is a toughie to find in decent condition and when it is clean, they sell for crazy money. I've pretty much quit looking for a copy for my set (was trying to build a clean set without cracks), because it just isn't financially feasible.

    P.S. Maybe you should just dive in and become an A's fan. They can use all the support they can get.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I did not know that. Is he the only one? If so, it would be interesting to know why.

      I've said it many times before, but between style of play, and all of the silly rule changes, I just can't watch modern baseball (or any other sport) anymore.

      Delete
  11. Congrats on 700! Your post prompted me to check how many posts I had - looks like I'll be hitting a major milestone this year myself!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm not usually very good at keeping track of such things, but I noticed last month while clearing out some old drafts that I was getting close, so I made sure to try and stay on top of it so that I could say something when it came around.

      Delete